MP3 not successor to CD Jul08 '04

Feedback

# (1 of 3): Daniel J. Wilson » blog.wilsonet.com

6 hours, 48 minutes after the fact. (Thu 08 Jul 2004, 2:06 PM CST)

Is there any particular reason you aren't using AAC? Better quality than MP3 at the same file size…

# (2 of 3): Matt

7 hours, 14 minutes after the fact. (Thu 08 Jul 2004, 2:32 PM CST)

I thought the AAC format was a "locked" format. I was under the assumption that I would have more freedom with my digital track if it was in MP3 format, rather than the AAC format... Of course I am probably very wrong.

Previous comment Return to entry

# (3 of 3): Daniel J. Wilson » blog.wilsonet.com

2 days after the fact. (Sat 10 Jul 2004, 7:58 AM CST)

The AAC files encoded by iTunes (via QuickTime) are completely unencumbered - no use restrictions other than playback support not being nearly as widespread as that for MP3.

Previous comment Return to entry

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave feedback

Feedback

Input format: The editor controls below will assist with Markdown syntax.

Status

Sub-status

Your info

Return to entry.

You are at the feedback permalink page for: MP3 not successor to CD

Read more...