HTML to XHTML – a refresher Nov30 '04

Feedback

# (1 of 3): Joshua Street » joahua.com

4 hours, 36 minutes after the fact. (Tue 30 Nov 2004, 11:54 PM CST)

Snazzy summary. You're missing information regarding content encoding and MIME types, though -- the latter of which is a requisite for Strict and 1.1, from memory. Anne always has a lot to say (or rant!) about this particular issue, and there was a lengthy discussion about it on WSG a few weeks back.

Other than that, good job!

# (2 of 3): Matthew » mattavenger.com

10 hours, 17 minutes after the fact. (Wed 01 Dec 2004, 5:35 AM CST)

That's fantastic. Good work that's exactly what I needed.
;)I've been learning HTML and looking at PHP now.
Thxs for puting that up. I really appreciate it. Cheers.

Previous comment Return to entry

# (3 of 3): Matthom

17 hours, 4 minutes after the fact. (Wed 01 Dec 2004, 12:22 PM CST)

A good point made by 'HTML dog' today, regarding using Strict over Transitional doctypes.

http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/archives/000078.php

Previous comment Return to entry

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave feedback

Feedback

Input format: The editor controls below will assist with Markdown syntax.

Status

Sub-status

Your info Name: Email (will not show on page):

Follow new comments via email? (You can turn this off any time)

Do you want your comments emailed to yourself?

Home Page (optional):

Return to entry.

matthom is published and produced by Matt Thommes - an independent publishing enthusiast, mobile blogger, content creator, informative writer, web developer from Chicago. Never one to conform, Matt intends to promote the effect the web has on our lives, in an effort to intensify, instruct, and clarify all that is happening around us.

Contact Matt

It never hurts to refresh the memory, does it?

You are at the feedback permalink page for: HTML to XHTML – a refresher