Digital music: subscription or download? Jan03 '05

Feedback

# (1 of 2): Roxy

13 hours, 1 minute after the fact. (Tue 04 Jan 2005, 8:09 AM CST)

So if i go to one of those other sites (ie napster)i have to pay a fee which is probably like $10 a month and i can only listen to my music on my computer cause if i do us anyother source to play it (ie burn a cd) I have to pay, what a rip off, so in the long run the website is costing more than it would to go to i tunes and get the song for 99. What a joke!

# (2 of 2): Chris Moritz » campbell-ewald.com

13 hours, 29 minutes after the fact. (Tue 04 Jan 2005, 8:37 AM CST)

Call me old fashioned, but I just can't get behind the idea of "renting" my music.

Previous comment Return to entry

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave feedback

Feedback

Input format: The editor controls below will assist with Markdown syntax.

Status

Sub-status

Your info Name: Email (will not show on page):

Follow new comments via email? (You can turn this off any time)

Do you want your comments emailed to yourself?

Home Page (optional):

Return to entry.

matthom is published and produced by Matt Thommes - an independent publishing enthusiast, mobile blogger, content creator, informative writer, web developer from Chicago. Never one to conform, Matt intends to promote the effect the web has on our lives, in an effort to intensify, instruct, and clarify all that is happening around us.

Contact Matt

Some debate has been going on regarding the subscription vs. download approach to digital music.

You are at the feedback permalink page for: Digital music: subscription or download?