Acronym vs. Abbreviation Jan05 '05

Feedback

# (1 of 4): Joshua Street » joahua.com

20 hours, 43 minutes after the fact. (Thu 06 Jan 2005, 6:22 AM CST)

I'd always drawn the distinction differently...

Acronyms correspond directly to letters (GUI - Graphical User Interface) whilst Abbreviations aren't so true to form -- take the example of abbrev. -- it's an abbreviation of abbreviation. As opposed to your approach of phonetics...

I'm too tired right now to think enough to find evidence either way, but I don't know I agree with you so far as the definitions go... sure, there's a difference, and as such it's important to use the different elements, but I'm (in a tired state) disputing your definitions... *shrug*

# (2 of 4): Matthom

21 hours, 20 minutes after the fact. (Thu 06 Jan 2005, 6:59 AM CST)

Josh, are you referring to the definitions in the English language, or the HTML elements?

Because, you're right - they might differ a little.

I'm almost 100% positive that my definition (here) of the HTML elements are correct.

As far as the English language - I can't be so sure.

Previous comment Return to entry

# (3 of 4): Joshua Street » joahua.com

1 day, 4 hours after the fact. (Thu 06 Jan 2005, 2:29 PM CST)

Well, I just briefly flicked over the W3C recommendations for XHTML 1.0, and couldn't see anything. I just checked a dictionary, and my (English language, not XHTML spec) definitions were correct:
Abbreviation
Acronym

I'm still unconvinced about the difference in spec terminology, but remain open to links.

Anyway, amidst this (kind of pointless, for all the practical difference it makes -- sorry for wasting time!) debate over terminology, in terms of actual usability I think it's best to define and redefine a term as much as is realistic rather than not too much -- another idea is to have an appendix of acronyms at the end of a (more lengthy) document, taking advantage of target hyperlinks from the content body. This allows you to not only define terms, but also give explanation/annotation as required.

Josh

Previous comment Return to entry

# (4 of 4): Matthom

1 day, 8 hours after the fact. (Thu 06 Jan 2005, 5:53 PM CST)

The W3C has nothing on <acronym> or <abbr> elements?

I was thinking more about the English language definitions for each word, and you're right - an abbreviation is nothing like it is defined in HTML.

Maybe I'll try to find some links with better information...

Previous comment Return to entry

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave feedback

Feedback

Input format: The editor controls below will assist with Markdown syntax.

Status

Sub-status

Your info

Return to entry.

matthom is published and produced by Matt Thommes - an independent publishing enthusiast, mobile blogger, content creator, informative writer, web developer from Chicago. Never one to conform, Matt intends to promote the effect the web has on our lives, in an effort to intensify, instruct, and clarify all that is happening around us.

Contact Matt

In the English language, there is a small, yet subtle difference between an acronym and an abbreviation, which can be applied to your HTML.

You are at the feedback permalink page for: Acronym vs. Abbreviation

Read more...