Brands and expanding offerings
August 13, 2007
/ Filed under: Branding, Consumerism
From Kevin Keating:
Kevin is referring to restaurants (more distinguishably, brands) that constantly expand their menu items in an effort to increase sales, or attract new customers. His theory is that by getting away from their true "bread and butter," they are somehow damaging the brand image itself.
If you're not careful, Kevin warns:
He even goes on to say:
I'm gonna stop here because I'm in full disagreement. In fact, I can't be more adamant. Brands have to expand their product line - in this case, their menu items. How else can they compete? Nobody can survive forever selling the same product. Eventually change must happen. There's nothing wrong with expanding your product offerings. In fact, a good brand adapts to your products and services - not the other way around. Your brand consists of your products and services. Your products and services don't consist of your brand. It doesn't matter if Subway starts selling Apple computers, for example. It's still under the Subway brand. It's their brand and they can mold it how they please. A brand is not going to suffer because it is expanding it's product offerings. Using Apple as an example - they started out as a hardware company. Now they are in the music industry. How is that not a complete transformation? Lowes sells groceries, for crying out loud. Groceries at a "home improvement" store. The point is - neither of these brands are suffering because they began selling other items, different from their "bread and butter." UPDATE: I meant Menards, not Lowes. I've verified that Menards sells non-perishable goods. Perhaps Lowes does too. I've honestly never been in a Lowes.
Comments/Mentions
|
Editor Picks
Email NewsletterSubscribe to the digest newsletter to receive posts by email: Recent Comments
Advertisements
|
If you look at individual household brands you can see that they have deversified themselves with in the market place. An example is Kellogg's; they have Kashi and Morning Star Farms, both are geared towards the healthy eater. The only difference between the 2 brands is that one uses meat and the other is geared towards the non meat eating public. Maybe the reason why people are noticing the diversification of brands such as Subway and Dunkin Donuts is becuase it is in your face wherever you go. Many of your household brands have diversified themselves to cater to more than just one target demographic. You dont realize that Kelloggs makes some its own competitve products because they dont have Kelloggs on the label. Our world is full of diversified brands and it will continue to grow to meet the on going needs of their consumers. In the case of Subway bring out a pizza it solves a couples issue of where to eat, one wants a sub one wants pizza; now Subway meets the need of both and wins the sale. Wendy's expanded thier menu to soon include breakfast, to meet the needs of their consumers who want to go to Wendy's to eat breakfast. All this is the brands responding to it's consumers.